Capital Requirements
Capital
Requirements are the most obvious area where Solvency II will have the most
impact. The current EC system calculates
capital requirements on Asset values, Insurance Provisions and Net Written
Premium. The Capital requirements under
Solvency II will consist of two levels, the Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR)
and the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR).

Key
|
1: Technical provisions to match
insurers' liabilities; (Undiscounted in Solvency I – Discounted in Solvency
II) |
|
Solvency I |
|
Solvency II |
MCR – Minimum Capital Requirement:
As the title suggests this is the minimum level of capital a
firm must hold; if a firm breaches this level ultimate supervisory action will
be triggered. The exact specification of
the MCR is currently undecided. Further
information can be found under the section ‘MCR’.
SCR – Solvency Capital
Requirement:
This can be viewed somewhat as a ‘buffer’ above the MCR
which although can be breached, the severity of the breach will provoke some
level of intervention by supervisors.
The ladder of intervention is used by supervisors to act upon these
breaches. The SCR can be calculated via
two methods; a standard formula or an approved internal model which captures
the risk profile of the undertaking.
There can also be partial internal models, blending come elements of the
standard formula and internal models together.
Adjusted SCR:
This is the SCR plus any
capital add-ons to account for risks which is not fully accounted for in the
SCR. These add-ons can be imposed by the
supervisor and results in a higher capital requirement for deficiencies in the
risk profile of an undertakings business for the purposes of calculating the
SCR.
Solvency II
is aiming for an altogether more risk based system which, which provides a
cushion and early supervisory warning to warn against difficulties. This has
been dubbed the ‘supervisory ladder of intervention’. Further information can be found under the
section ‘SCR’
Ladder of Intervention:
The supervisory ladder of intervention denotes the action
which a supervisor will take if certain capital thresholds are breached. The following table (Table 1) summarises this
so-called ‘ladder’. It is therefore
imperative that the SCR and MCR work together so that this ‘ladder’ can be
maintained.
When developing these capital requirements it is necessary
to assess the valuation of assets and liabilities. Where possible this has to be done on a market
consistent (i.e. in line with that of a deep and liquid market’s) pricing
basis. Where this is not possible a Best
Estimate + Risk Margin methodology is used to value these assets. The method of assessing the risk margin has
been somewhat open to debate.
Table 1: Supervisory
Ladder of Intervention
|
|
Additional
Reporting |
Financial
Recovery Plan |
Closure
to New Business |
Authorisation
Withdrawn |
|
No Breach (Adequate Capital) |
Not Required |
Not Required |
Not Required |
Not Required |
|
Breach of Adjusted SCR |
Required |
Possible |
Not Required |
Not Required |
|
Breach of SCR |
Required |
Required |
Possible |
Not Required |
|
Breach of MCR |
Required |
Required |
Required |
Possible |
Solvency II intends for institutions’ capital to be equivalent
to at least a BBB Credit rating and thus should be able to cope with a
one-in-two hundred year event.
Consequently it is anticipated that a 99.5% Value at Risk (VaR)
distribution will be used to calibrate the SCR.
Value at Risk is the probability distribution used to
calculate risk of default on the target level of Capital. By being set at a 99.5% confidence level,
the probability of default is equivalent to a 1-in-200 year event.
Tiered Capital:
Capital
will be tiered according to its degree of loss absorbency. Limitations will be placed upon the amount of
each capital which can be held. For
further information see the section under ‘Own Funds’
Contact Secretariat: Richard Camp
DISCLAIMER:
All the
information provided within this website is provided for convenience only and
IUA do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy of this
information. Users of this site should consult their lawyers and other relevant
professional bodies as necessary.